Understanding the Atul Subhash Suicide: Gender Bias, Legal Harassment, and the Need for Reform
Introduction
The tragic suicide of 34-year-old Bengaluru-based software engineer, Atul Subhash, has ignited significant discussions about the complexities of marital disputes, the potential misuse of legal provisions, and the emotional toll of protracted legal battles in India. This case study delves into the intricate details of Subhash's life, the circumstances leading to his death, the legal implications, and the broader societal impact.
Background and Personal Life
Atul Subhash, a man originally hailing from Samastipur, Bihar, was a driven and accomplished professional. Working as a Deputy General Manager at a prestigious private firm in Bengaluru, he had established a stable career in the fast-paced corporate world. His life seemed to be on track as he settled in Bengaluru, a city that promised not just career growth but also personal happiness.
In 2019, Atul took a significant step in his personal life by marrying Nikita Singhania, a woman he had met through an online matchmaking platform. This seemed to be the beginning of a new chapter, one that held the promise of love, companionship, and family. Their union was celebrated as a new journey, and in 2020, the couple welcomed a son, adding to the joy of their lives and marking what should have been a moment of fulfillment in Atul’s life.
However, beneath the surface of this seemingly happy marriage, tensions began to rise. Over time, what appeared to be a picture-perfect relationship began to show cracks. The initial charm of their marriage wore off as disagreements escalated into more serious conflicts. Atul’s marriage, once filled with hope and expectations, gradually descended into a troubled relationship marked by deep emotional stress. The issues began with small misunderstandings, but as they built up, the situation deteriorated rapidly.
The couple's marital problems soon became public knowledge, with rumors circulating about the growing emotional and financial strain between them. As the conflicts grew, it became apparent that these issues were not merely personal disputes but also involved external pressures that weighed heavily on the relationship.
One of the major factors that contributed to the unraveling of their marriage was financial pressure. Atul alleged that Nikita and her family had begun to impose financial demands on him. According to his claims, Nikita’s family expected him to financially support ventures they were involved in, with some even seeking large sums of money for business ventures and personal projects.
Atul found himself in an uncomfortable position, as he was unable or unwilling to meet these demands. This disagreement over financial matters was one of the pivotal turning points in their relationship. Atul’s refusal to comply with these requests seemed to only exacerbate the situation, leading to further emotional and verbal confrontations. The financial strain, combined with the emotional toll of constant disputes, created an atmosphere of tension and dissatisfaction in the marriage.
As the years passed, the personal conflict between Atul and Nikita evolved into a series of legal battles. What might have been resolved through private discussions now became entangled in the legal system. Nikita, in particular, was reported to have filed multiple cases against Atul, accusing him of dowry harassment and domestic violence, allegations that were both painful and public. These legal actions, according to Atul, were not only baseless but were used as tools of harassment. The emotional and mental strain of constantly fighting legal battles added another layer of pressure on Atul, who was already dealing with the emotional turmoil in his personal life. He claimed that his wife's accusations and the legal procedures were starting to take a severe toll on his well-being. The legal process, with its delays and complications, compounded his distress, making him feel increasingly isolated and vulnerable.
The toll of these legal issues, paired with the personal conflicts, began to affect Atul’s mental health. His career, once flourishing, seemed to be slipping away as he became embroiled in these personal and legal battles. The weight of defending himself against accusations that he felt were unjust, combined with the emotional scars from his deteriorating marriage, began to overshadow his life. In his private moments, Atul must have felt the intense pressure of trying to juggle his career, his family life, and the burden of ongoing legal battles. The reality of his situation seemed to become unbearable, with little respite from the stress that plagued him daily. His distress was not just a matter of personal disappointment, but a matter of survival, as the emotional toll left him struggling to find peace.
Despite the emotional and legal battles, Atul’s love for his young son remained a central aspect of his life. Throughout the turmoil, he was reportedly committed to his son’s well-being, but the increasing conflicts between him and Nikita only made it harder for him to maintain a semblance of normalcy in his family life. The couple’s son, born in 2020, was just a young child caught in the middle of the storm that was tearing his parents apart. Atul’s desire to provide for and protect his child, while simultaneously dealing with the demands of an increasingly contentious relationship, created a profound emotional conflict. The marriage, which should have been a source of support, became a source of great distress, and the legal disputes only intensified the strain on his relationship with his son. Despite these personal struggles, Atul remained, at least outwardly, committed to providing a stable environment for his child, though the emotional burden of these efforts was clear.
Atul’s personal life, once filled with dreams of a happy family and a successful career, had devolved into a long series of emotional and legal conflicts that drained him. His struggle was not merely one of personal grievances but a complex intersection of family dynamics, financial pressures, and the emotional toll of ongoing legal disputes. The cracks in his marriage and the growing sense of helplessness in the face of relentless legal battles eventually contributed to his tragic decision. In the end, Atul Subhash’s story is not just one of a troubled marriage or legal battles but a stark reminder of the emotional and mental toll that unresolved conflicts and prolonged stress can have on an individual. His life, marked by ambition, love, and personal sacrifice, was overshadowed by circumstances that spiraled beyond his control, leading to a tragic and heartbreaking conclusion..
Allegations and Legal Battles
In the tragic case of Atul Subhash, his suicide note and accompanying video shed light on a series of serious allegations against his estranged wife, Nikita, and her family. These claims point to both personal and legal battles that caused immense emotional and financial distress to Atul. Below are the detailed allegations made by Subhash in his final statements.
Financial Demands
One of the core issues Atul Subhash highlighted in his note was the financial strain imposed by his wife, Nikita, and her family. According to Subhash, Nikita and her family demanded substantial sums of money to fund various business ventures they were involved in. Subhash alleged that these financial demands were constant and aggressive, putting significant pressure on him. When he refused to provide the funds, the situation worsened, with accusations and personal confrontations escalating. He expressed how this constant financial strain contributed to the breakdown of his marriage, as it shifted the relationship dynamics from one of mutual support to one focused on monetary expectations. The mounting pressure of these demands, paired with the emotional toll of conflict, significantly contributed to the deteriorating state of his personal life. His refusal to meet these financial demands was portrayed as a key factor that led to the growing animosity between him and his wife, further deepening the divide and pushing him toward despair.
Legal Harassment
Another major point raised by Subhash in his suicide note was the legal harassment he allegedly endured at the hands of his wife. He claimed that Nikita filed multiple legal cases against him, accusing him of various offenses, including dowry harassment, domestic violence, and even attempted murder. These allegations, according to Subhash, were unfounded and intended solely to harass him. He expressed in his video how these legal proceedings drained him both emotionally and financially. The constant presence of legal cases not only affected his professional life but also put a severe strain on his mental well-being. The emotional distress of dealing with accusations, some of which Subhash deemed completely false, took a toll on his health and his sense of justice. He believed that the legal system, rather than offering support, had become a tool for his wife’s family to inflict further harm. The sheer number of cases and the prolonged legal battles left him feeling helpless, isolated, and worn out, adding to his growing sense of despair and emotional exhaustion.
Extortion Attempts
Subhash also accused Nikita and her family of extortion. According to his claims, Nikita demanded a sum of ₹3 crore from him to settle the ongoing legal disputes between them. Additionally, she allegedly sought ₹30 lakh for visitation rights to their son, effectively using the child as leverage in the ongoing conflict. Subhash’s note highlighted how these demands were not merely financial but were framed in the context of resolving the legal cases, implying that these sums were required for any hope of reconciliation or to avoid further legal trouble. This attempt to extort money from him, especially under the guise of settling the legal cases or securing visitation rights, compounded the emotional toll he was already enduring. Subhash's allegations painted a picture of an abusive dynamic where financial control and legal threats were used to coerce him into agreeing to terms that he felt were both unfair and exploitative. The fact that such demands were made against the backdrop of an already strained relationship exacerbated his sense of being trapped in an unresolvable and harmful situation.
Judicial Corruption
Perhaps one of the most shocking allegations made by Subhash was his claim of judicial corruption. He alleged that a judge handling one of his cases demanded a bribe of ₹5 lakh to “settle” the matter. This claim, if true, pointed to the deeply concerning issue of corruption within the judicial system, where individuals could influence the outcome of legal proceedings by offering financial incentives. Subhash expressed his deep disillusionment with the legal system, feeling that the very system meant to protect individuals and ensure justice was instead fostering an environment of exploitation. His frustration was compounded by the emotional and financial strain of the legal battles, and the idea that even the judiciary could be swayed by money further eroded his trust in the process. For Subhash, this was a key factor that pushed him into despair, as he believed that the system was not only failing him but also contributing to his sense of helplessness. This, coupled with his sense of being trapped in an ongoing cycle of legal battles, led him to question the fairness and integrity of the very institution that was meant to resolve his disputes.
These allegations paint a picture of a man who was overwhelmed by legal, financial, and emotional pressures. Each of these claims illustrates the complex and troubling dynamics that led to his eventual tragedy. Whether or not all the allegations are substantiated, Subhash’s note reveals the devastating impact that prolonged legal and personal conflicts can have on an individual’s mental health, leading to a tragic loss of life.
Circumstances Leading to Suicide
On December 9, 2024, the body of Atul Subhash was discovered in his Bengaluru apartment, marking the tragic end to a life filled with personal, legal, and emotional turmoil. His death sent shockwaves through his family, friends, and colleagues, as well as through the wider community. Subhash’s passing was not an impulsive decision, but the culmination of a prolonged period of suffering, compounded by a series of unresolved issues that had plagued his personal and professional life. Before ending his life, Subhash left behind a detailed 24-page suicide note and an 80-minute video, both of which have since become critical pieces of evidence that shed light on the underlying causes of his despair. The notes and video served as a final cry for justice, as Subhash repeatedly emphasized the phrase "justice is due" at the beginning of each page of his suicide note. This phrase was not just a literal expression of his sense of being wronged but also a poignant reflection of his emotional state—a man who had lost hope in the very systems that were supposed to protect him and provide relief.
In his suicide note, Subhash articulated the deep sense of helplessness and frustration he had been experiencing for years. He spoke candidly about the toll that his ongoing legal battles had taken on him. The multiple cases filed against him by his wife, Nikita, including charges of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and even murder, had left him feeling cornered and persecuted. Despite his attempts to clear his name, the relentless nature of these legal battles wore him down emotionally, mentally, and financially. He described how the constant legal pressure had become a source of unbearable stress, leaving him isolated from his loved ones and unable to focus on his career or personal happiness. Subhash’s grievances extended beyond his wife’s accusations; he also felt betrayed by the legal system, which he believed had failed him. He felt that justice was either delayed or denied at every turn, which only deepened his sense of alienation and despair. In his view, the legal process had become a weapon of harassment rather than a means of resolving disputes, and the judicial system’s apparent inefficiency and corruption added to his disillusionment.
Subhash’s frustration was compounded by the allegations of financial exploitation and extortion that he described in both the note and the video. His wife’s family, according to his account, had been demanding large sums of money under the guise of supporting business ventures. When he refused to comply, he felt that these demands led to an escalation in the conflicts within his marriage. Furthermore, he alleged that Nikita and her family had used their child as leverage, demanding substantial sums of money in exchange for allowing him visitation rights. This, Subhash claimed, was another example of how his life had become a series of manipulative, financially driven disputes. The emotional toll of these experiences left him feeling trapped in a cycle of legal and personal battles with no way out. His desire for peace, stability, and justice seemed increasingly out of reach as he navigated a maze of manipulative tactics, emotional abuse, and constant legal confrontation.
Subhash also expressed a sense of betrayal in his final message, feeling abandoned by the very institutions that were meant to offer him protection and support. He accused certain elements of the judiciary of being corrupt, alleging that a judge had demanded a bribe to settle one of his legal cases. This, for Subhash, represented a profound breakdown of faith in the legal system. He described how the judicial corruption and inefficiencies made him feel powerless, as though he was unable to trust anyone within the system that was supposed to uphold justice. He also detailed his increasing isolation, noting that he felt unsupported by his colleagues, friends, and even his own family. Despite his attempts to find solace and assistance, Subhash felt that no one could truly understand the depth of his suffering. The financial and emotional drain of these ongoing legal disputes, paired with the increasing sense of hopelessness, left him feeling as though he had no escape from his circumstances.
Subhash’s decision to end his life was not an impulsive one but rather the result of years of mounting pressure. His final words, both written and spoken, revealed a man at the breaking point, struggling to cope with the overwhelming weight of his experiences. The 24-page note and the 80-minute video were not just a cry for justice but also a final attempt to communicate his side of the story—a story that, in his eyes, had been ignored by those who could have helped him. In those final moments, Subhash sought to make it clear that his death was not a simple act of despair but a complex culmination of personal, legal, and systemic failures. His inability to find any form of justice or relief, after years of suffering, pushed him to a tragic end. His suicide serves as a stark reminder of the emotional toll that prolonged legal battles, financial extortion, and marital strife can take on an individual. It also raises important questions about the effectiveness and integrity of the legal system, the prevalence of judicial corruption, and the need for reform in handling such cases. Ultimately, Subhash’s tragic death is a call for greater empathy, understanding, and reform, to prevent others from experiencing the same despair that led to his untimely demise.
Legal Actions Post-Suicide
Following the tragic death of Atul Subhash, his family sought legal recourse by filing a case of abetment to suicide against his estranged wife, Nikita, and several members of her family. The family’s decision to pursue legal action reflected their belief that Nikita and her relatives had played a significant role in Subhash's emotional distress, which ultimately led to his suicide. The case, filed after the discovery of Subhash’s 24-page suicide note and the 80-minute video in which he detailed his grievances, pointed to the role of Nikita, her mother, Nisha, her brother, Anurag, and her uncle, Sushil, in contributing to the circumstances that pushed Subhash to take his own life. The family’s allegations focused on the emotional, financial, and legal harassment that Subhash had endured, all of which were believed to have intensified his sense of despair.
The Bengaluru Police took swift action in response to the family’s complaint, arresting Nikita in Gurugram, Haryana, where she had been staying. Her arrest marked the beginning of the legal process to hold her accountable for the accusations made against her. Subhash’s family had accused Nikita of harassment, extortion, and legal manipulation, all of which they believed directly contributed to Subhash’s mental and emotional breakdown. The case of abetment to suicide, a serious charge under Indian law, involves allegations that someone has knowingly and intentionally caused another person to take their own life. In Subhash’s case, his family argued that the pressure from Nikita and her family, including the financial demands and legal harassment, had become so overwhelming that it ultimately drove him to suicide. The charge of abetment to suicide is a grave legal accusation, and if proven, it could lead to significant consequences for the individuals involved.
In addition to Nikita's arrest, Subhash’s family also named her mother, Nisha, and her brother, Anurag, as key players in the events that led to Subhash’s tragic end. Both Nisha and Anurag were arrested in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, where they had been residing. The arrests of these family members further underscored the seriousness of the allegations made against them. The family accused them of being complicit in the alleged extortion attempts and financial demands that Subhash had faced over the course of his troubled marriage to Nikita. The charges included allegations that Nisha and Anurag had been involved in coercing Subhash for money, which he had refused to provide. This financial pressure, combined with the emotional toll of the ongoing legal battles, was cited as a key factor in Subhash’s declining mental state. Like Nikita, both Nisha and Anurag were remanded to judicial custody, where they would await further investigation and trial. Their arrests signaled a significant step in the legal proceedings, as the police sought to build a case against the family for their alleged role in Subhash’s death.
While Nikita, Nisha, and Anurag were taken into custody, there remained one key figure who had not been apprehended—Sushil, Nikita's uncle. According to the police, Sushil was currently absconding, and efforts were underway to locate and arrest him. The role that Sushil may have played in the events leading to Subhash’s suicide is still unclear, but his absence from custody raised further questions about the full extent of the family’s involvement in the alleged harassment of Subhash. The investigation into Sushil's role was ongoing, with law enforcement working to gather more information and ensure that all parties allegedly responsible for Subhash’s death would face legal consequences. The fact that he had gone into hiding only added to the complexities of the case, as authorities sought to determine whether he had any direct involvement in the harassment, extortion, or other actions that might have contributed to the tragic outcome.
The legal actions taken after Subhash's death not only brought attention to the specific individuals allegedly responsible for his suffering but also highlighted broader issues of domestic harassment, extortion, and the emotional toll of prolonged legal battles. The case of abetment to suicide, now being pursued by Subhash’s family, raises important questions about the ways in which emotional and financial manipulation can affect a person’s mental health and well-being. Subhash’s family hopes that by holding Nikita and her relatives accountable, they can find justice for the man they lost and, in doing so, bring attention to the serious consequences of domestic conflict and abuse. The case also underscores the need for legal reforms in handling cases of emotional abuse, marital disputes, and the prevention of domestic violence, as well as the importance of providing support systems for individuals who may be facing emotional and mental distress in such situations. As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome of the case could have significant implications for both the individuals involved and for the broader legal landscape in India.
Custody Battle and Family's Plea
In the wake of Atul Subhash's tragic death, a crucial issue that has arisen is the custody of his young son, whose whereabouts remain unknown. The child, born in 2020, was the subject of multiple legal disputes between Atul and his estranged wife, Nikita. Following Subhash's suicide, his family, particularly his father Pawan Kumar, has been fighting for custody, fearing for the child's safety and well-being under Nikita’s care. The uncertainty surrounding the child’s location has fueled the family's concerns, as they believe that Nikita, amid the ongoing legal battles and the allegations surrounding her, may not be in a position to provide a stable or safe environment for their grandson.
In their pursuit of custody, Pawan Kumar and the rest of the family have been vocal about their distress and have sought assistance from political leaders to expedite the process. They have specifically appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, hoping for his intervention in locating the child and ensuring that the legal process of custody is carried out in a fair and transparent manner. The family has raised serious concerns about the child’s emotional and physical well-being, considering the distressing events surrounding his father’s death. Their plea highlights the need for the child to grow up in a stable and nurturing environment, free from the chaos of ongoing legal battles and family conflicts. The legal complexities of a custody battle in the aftermath of such a traumatic event have further intensified the emotional toll on Subhash’s family, making the situation more challenging. As the custody dispute progresses, it is expected to have significant implications, not only for the child’s future but also for the resolution of the broader family conflict that has tragically escalated into a case of abetment to suicide and emotional distress.
Broader Legal and Social Implications
The death of Atul Subhash has sparked a nationwide conversation about the potential misuse of legal provisions that are meant to protect women but may, in some cases, be exploited to cause harm to men. Laws such as the Dowry Prohibition Act and those against domestic violence are designed to protect women from exploitation and abuse. However, the case of Subhash has brought to light the darker side of these provisions, where they may be misused to harass innocent individuals and, in some instances, contribute to severe emotional and mental distress. Subhash’s family has pointed out that the multiple legal cases filed by Nikita, including accusations of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and even murder, were not only unfounded but also part of a strategy to financially and emotionally drain Atul. They argue that the use of such laws in this context highlights a systemic flaw in their implementation, which could lead to the harassment of men who may be wrongfully accused.
The misuse of legal provisions is a matter of grave concern, particularly when such accusations can lead to significant emotional distress, financial loss, and, as seen in this case, even the loss of life. Subhash’s tragic death has thus led to a wider debate about the need for reforms to prevent the exploitation of these laws. Advocates argue that while laws to protect women’s rights are essential, there must be safeguards to prevent their abuse by individuals seeking to manipulate the legal system for personal gain. The notion that such laws could be weaponized to target innocent individuals has led to calls for reform in how domestic violence and dowry harassment cases are handled, ensuring that allegations are thoroughly investigated and substantiated before they result in legal consequences.
In response to these concerns, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court, seeking a review of the laws governing dowry and domestic violence. The PIL advocates for a more balanced approach that ensures the protection of both women and men in cases of domestic disputes, reducing the possibility of misuse. The petition highlights the need for comprehensive legal reforms, including the establishment of guidelines to prevent the exploitation of such laws, and the creation of more effective mechanisms to address the grievances of all parties involved. The Supreme Court’s review of these laws could set a precedent for future legal reforms, potentially altering how these sensitive cases are handled across the country. This legal and social debate underscores the complexity of balancing the protection of vulnerable individuals with the prevention of legal exploitation, a challenge that will continue to shape the landscape of family law in India for years to come.
Judicial Perspective on Alimony and Maintenance
The case involving Atul Subhash and his estranged wife Nikita has also brought into focus the recent Supreme Court rulings regarding alimony and maintenance in matrimonial disputes. In a separate but pertinent case, the Supreme Court outlined a framework for determining fair maintenance in divorce or separation proceedings. The Court emphasized that maintenance should not only be about financial support but also reflect a balanced approach considering both parties’ social, financial, and economic conditions. The primary goal is to avoid disproportionate burdens placed on either party and to ensure that the needs of the individual receiving maintenance are met in a way that respects their standard of living during the marriage.
In the case of Subhash and Nikita, maintenance and financial demands played a pivotal role. Subhash’s allegations about his wife’s family demanding substantial sums of money, both for business ventures and as extortion for visitation rights to see his son, raise important questions about how alimony and maintenance laws are applied in practice. While maintenance is generally intended to ensure the welfare of a spouse after a divorce or separation, it should also be mindful of both parties’ ability to pay and their financial responsibilities. The recent Supreme Court guidelines stress considering the incomes of both individuals, ensuring that maintenance is a fair reflection of their current financial capacity rather than a continuation of the standard of living maintained during the marriage. In this case, it could be argued that the financial pressures Subhash faced were compounded by the legal demands, which made him feel financially drained. The Court’s ruling on the matter aims to provide a more equitable approach, ensuring that the financial burden is not placed unfairly on one individual, which can sometimes lead to emotional and mental distress.
Additionally, the guidelines highlight the need for sensitivity in matrimonial disputes, particularly when one party may be left financially vulnerable after the end of a marriage. The ruling recognizes that both spouses should be able to move forward after separation without being unduly burdened by the other’s financial demands. This approach aims to prevent financial exploitation, which seems to have been a central issue in Subhash’s case, where he was allegedly coerced into providing large sums of money for various reasons. The guidelines aim to strike a fair balance, preventing misuse while ensuring that the parties’ needs are met without causing undue hardship.
Public Outcry and Media Coverage
The tragic suicide of Atul Subhash has triggered widespread public outcry, drawing attention to gender biases in the legal system and the emotional toll of prolonged legal battles. The case has become a focal point for discussions about the systemic issues affecting men in matrimonial disputes, particularly in cases involving allegations of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and extortion. Public reactions have largely centered on the emotional and financial toll such disputes take on individuals, with many criticizing the legal system for exacerbating these issues instead of offering relief.
One of the primary concerns raised in the media is the apparent gender bias in the legal system, where men often feel disadvantaged in matrimonial cases. This is a sentiment echoed by men’s rights activists, who have highlighted Subhash’s case as emblematic of larger systemic problems. They argue that the current legal framework, while intended to protect women from domestic violence and harassment, can sometimes be misused to the detriment of men. In Subhash’s case, his allegations of extortion and false accusations of abuse were seen by some as an indication that the protective laws intended for women can be manipulated to coerce men into financial and emotional submission. These activists contend that men facing such abuse often do not have sufficient support systems within the legal framework, leading to emotional and psychological distress.
Additionally, the prolonged nature of legal disputes, as seen in Subhash’s case, has sparked conversations about the emotional and mental toll they take on individuals. The relentless nature of litigation, particularly when multiple cases are filed over a period of time, can create a toxic environment for the person being accused. In Subhash’s case, his detailed suicide note and video paint a picture of a man who felt trapped in an endless cycle of accusations, legal battles, and financial pressure. The emotional strain from these proceedings, without adequate support or respite, contributed to his sense of hopelessness.
This case has also raised calls for judicial reforms to prevent the misuse of protective laws, ensuring that the legal system does not become a tool of manipulation or coercion. Critics argue that the legal process must be more balanced and should offer equal protection and consideration for both parties involved, especially in cases where the allegations are complex or potentially false. Reforming the legal system to address these concerns could prevent future instances of emotional and financial exploitation, and ensure that justice is served more equitably. Overall, the incident has sparked a critical dialogue about the need for a more nuanced and compassionate approach to handling matrimonial disputes, with a focus on addressing the root causes of distress rather than simply offering punitive solutions.
Conclusion
The tragic demise of Atul Subhash underscores the complexities and potential pitfalls within India's legal system concerning marital disputes. It highlights the necessity for a balanced approach that protects genuine victims while preventing the exploitation of legal provisions. As the case continues to unfold, it serves as a catalyst for discussions on legal reforms, judicial accountability, and the importance of mental health support for individuals embroiled in protracted legal battles.
Reference:
1. Techie Atul Subhash's Wife Nikita, Her Mother and Brother Arrested
3. What Bengaluru police said on arrest of Atul Subash's wife in abetment to suicide case
Comments
Post a Comment